Evolution of the ecosystem
Monday, September 23, 2013
11:44 PM
Labels: aquatic , ecological , Ecosystem development and evolution , ecosystem. , energy powered , the eco system , 0 comments
Labels: aquatic , ecological , Ecosystem development and evolution , ecosystem. , energy powered , the eco system , 0 comments
As in the case with short term development, as described
earlier in this post, the long term evolution of ecosystems is shaped by the
interaction of allogenic geological and climatic changes and autogenic
processes resulting from the activities of the living components of the
ecosystem. In a broad sense the ‘’strategy’’ of long term evolutionary
development is the same as that of short term ecological succession, namely,
increased control of, or homeostasis with, the physical environment in the
sense of achieving maximum protection from its perturbations.
Although we may never know exactly how life began on earth,
the generally accepted theory is that the first living things were tiny
anaerobic (living without free oxygen) heterotrophs that lived on organic
matter synthesized by abiotic processes. The first successional development
then, may been more like the hay infusion culture model (see that post) than the autotrophic culture model. The atmo phere
at the time of the origin of life 3 billion years ago containe nitrogen,
hydrogen, carbon dioxide, water vapor, but little or oxygen. It also contained
carbon monoxide, chlorine, and hydrogen sulfide in quantities that would be
poisonous to much of present day life. The composition of the atmosphere in
those early days was largely determined by the gaseous stuff that comes out of
volcanos. The geologist would speak of this as ‘’atmospheric formation by
crusts outgassing.’’ The earth’s early reducing atmosphere (a term to contral with
oxygenic atmosphere) may have been similar to that now found on venus or
jupiter. Because of the lack of gaseous oxygen there was no ozone laver, as
there is now. Molecular oxygen o2 acted on b short – wave
untraviolet radiation produces ozone, or 03 which in turshields out
the deadly radiation. Thus, at first, life could existonly inshielded by water
or other barrers, but straange to say it was the short waved radiation that is
thought to have created a chemical evolution leading to complex organic molecules
such as amino acide that became the building blocks of life. This synthesis
also provided food for the first organisms.
For millions of years life apparently remained as only a
tiny foot hold, limited in habitat and energy source, in a violent physical
world. The big change began with the appearance of the first photosynthetion
algae which were able to make food from simple inorganic substances and which
released gaseous oxygen as a by product. As the oxygen diffused into the
atmosphere, the ozone shield developed and life could then spread to all parts
of the globe, and there followed an almost explosive evolution of increasingly
complex aerobic organisms. The broad pattern of the evolution of organisms of
organisms and the oxygenic atmosphere that make the biosphere absolutely uniqe
in our solar system is shown in this
post. Over long stretches of time production exceeded respiration (P/R >
1) so oxygen increased and CO2 decreased. Our fossil fuels were also
formed during periods when P exceeded R by a wide margin.
Incidentally, I can
think of no batter way to dramatize man’s dependence on his environment and to
become a wise custodian of this frail earth than to recount how our atmosphere
came into being, emphasizing, of course, that it was built by microorganisms,
not by men. I think the story of our air should be told to every school child
every citizen. It is a fascinating drama of living history with enough mystery
and potential tragedy to intrigue teacher and pupil alike. It is a subject
lends itself to student participation in learning since the possibilities for
study projects, artwork, plays, and the like are unlimited. Berkner and
marshall have writter both a population account (1966) and a more technical
treatise (1964) that provide good reference.
0 Response to "Evolution of the ecosystem "
Post a Comment